School reform, this is an issue that causes gasps or cheers. What do we mean by school reform? What results to we expect to get after these changes? Teachers, parents, administrators, and even presidents want schools to produce students that are literate in math, and English. The California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) is all over that. Are english and math enough?
In recent years, school reform has meant more standardized testing and less recess. More instructional time is spent on English and math than any other subject. Students will take a variety of tests during their tenure in the K-12 system. There is STAR (Standardized Testing and Reporting), CAHSEE, the California English Language Development Test (CDELT), SAT/9 and Cat/6. That’s just California. These exams take an up instructional days and all to often instructional content.
Testing doesn’t provide a true assessment of where students are. Many college are now saying that SAT and ASVAB scores are not the keystone they used to be. Why is that? You can cram for any test and get a high or at least a better one. In that instance the score is really the measure of how well you can cram. What can you do in a classroom or more importantly in life? You can’t cram for life.
As teachers prepstudents for exams, the must choose between what creates literate students and what makes good test takers. Time that could be spent on science or reading the U.S. Constitution get reallocated to testing skills and content preparation.People argue that this isn’t the case. I disagree. When funding is tied to achievement, you can bet time will be set aside to ensure district income. It makes perfect economic sense. But schools are about learning not about economics, right?
No. School are most definitely not about learning. My evidence for this is from first hand experience. Our school had a library that most students didn’t even know was there. There was a part time librarian that was eventually let go to save money. The district closed the print shop and now teachers must make all their own photo copies. That isn’t bad but they limit how much you can copy so they can save money. As another money saving device, the school nurse is only on site one day a week.
Money saving. That’s really what’s going on. The same year the district laid off over twenty teachers, the school board approved a pay raise for the Superintendent. Call me crazy, but even a 2% raise would mean a lot of copy paper. I forget what the raise actually was. None of this supports learning. The bottom line may work in the free-market but it doesn’t mix with education. Real learning must adapt to the needs of a large and varied population. This is not a one size fits all system. It has many niches areas. It can’t homogenized to fit into one industrial model.
Do really change our schools we have to change how we think about learning and really define what me mean by it. Anyone who has played Civilisation knows that you have to keep the populous happy to win. One way to do that is to keep them engaged. When you teach children and adults how to love learning, they have that for life. All to often what is taught is information control. I am the teacher, I will dispense this knowledge to you. You must then tell it back to me so I know that you know. How sad. Where is the love and fun in investigation the world around you?
Curiosityis a natural human trait. It need only be tapped to set off learning. The current education paradigm kills this need to know. Textbooks used in today’s classrooms sometimes aren’t even relevant. In one high school English book, the first story is about a middle aged man contemplating suicide. If you are a 15 year old girl from Mexico, how is that going to hook you? It isn’t.
The textbook industry is vested in districts buying their products. So often they are the only game in town and they set the standard for what is available in the classroom. I’m not saying don’t use them but balance them with relevant resources that students actually care about. This is dangerous ground. Ideas like this place the student ahead of the teacher in terms of classroom power. People don’t like this. “Ive gone to college and taken classes, tests, and student taught. These kids don’t know anything. That’s why I’m here.” Students know the most important thing, they know what they are interested in. When we can separate content from skills, we can teach skills. Students can select the content. Everyone wins.
Can we have meaningful school reform? Yes, but we must be willing to shine the light on our darkest places and excise the agendas we bring to the task of teaching. We must be willing to trust students to learn. We must make sure they have resources to learn with. False measures must be removed from the system. Education must include all subjects, history, music, art, science, physical education- not just math an English. Research shows the latter item to be true.
Fear of letting go of the old paradigm keeps us where we are and where we are isn’t working. We know it isn’t working because record numbers of California students are dropping out. In 2008 the dropout rate was 24% (SFGate.com accessed 5/9/09). We can blame the vitcim or we can make an educational system that meets thier needs. That’s what education should be about, the learner. With a little trust, it can be.